FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Interesting Article on Gill Nets from the Opposite

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
BrackishWater View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 18 December 2014
Location: Pamlico River
Status: Offline
Points: 512
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote BrackishWater Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Interesting Article on Gill Nets from the Opposite
    Posted: 04 August 2019 at 1:10pm
A rising tide lifts all boats...
Back to Top
TomM View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 11 July 2006
Location: Roanoke Rapids
Status: Offline
Points: 2489
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TomM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 August 2019 at 9:32pm
They kill everywhere
Back to Top
Rick View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 16 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 August 2019 at 8:22am

Gillnets…the Honest Truth, the Ugly Facts



I read somewhere in the past few weeks, that Washington Fish and Wildlife Director Kelly Susewind proclaimed that “Gillnets are specie specific”. This statement has been eating at me for all of those weeks ever since I read it. The statement simply is not true. Director Susewind’s statement is symptomatic of what is wrong with the fish management division at WDFW. The Director is off to a rough start at WDFW because of the figurative mountain of ills he has to climb to regain credibility in the department’s salmon and steelhead management. I think he’s trying.

But statements like the gillnet one digs him a hole in the contentious issue of the use of gillnets in Washington state’s commercial salmon fisheries, especially on the Columbia River. Where did he get this mis-information? I don’t think he was ever a gillnetter, but I could be wrong. Has he been aboard a gillnetter when it was fishing? Who knows? My guess is that he gained this tidbit of mis-information from a staffer or staffers who think that gillnets are a good deal when it comes to harvest and they ill-advised Director Susewind. There’s a lot to discuss about gillnets.

First of all, gillnets are NOT specie specific. They are SIZE selective, but only to a degree. Second they are an efficient harvester, but they always have bycatch.

I began my career as a Fisheries Patrol Officer on July 1, 1971, starting with six weeks spent on a Fisheries Patrol vessel (Number 1, to be specific) operated out of Bellingham by Officer Auzy Ausmondson, a veteran of many years. Our priorities were to patrol the gillnet, purse seine and reef net fisheries in the general area of the northern San Juans, and Strait of Georgia back when the sockeye commercial fishery was a going concern. I watched a lot of gillnets being pulled that summer. In the fall, I patrolled Puget Sound and Admiralty Inlet for the gillnet and purse seine fisheries there. I also pulled illegal gillnets from the Duwamish, Puyallup and Nisqually rivers in 1971 and ’72. In the summer of 1973, I was stationed on the Columbia River to patrol the commercial gillnet fishery, among a lot of other things. The Columbia had a healthy and vibrant run of salmon and steelhead in those days, and gillnet seasons were frequent. Mixed stocks of salmonids invaded the Columbia every month of the year.

In 1983, I was promoted to Fisheries Patrol Sergeant and supervised the patrol of gillnet and purse seine fisheries in mid to southern Puget Sound along with my other duties. To establish my credentials, I have observed likely thousands of gillnets pulled in my career, and also observed their catches. In addition I have pulled about a hundred gillnets myself – almost all of those were illegal and out of rivers.

Although the gillnet fisheries are not as prevalent as they were forty years ago when we had robust salmon returns, they could be utilized again, but only if we can re-build our salmon abundance to a much higher level, and we’ve got a long way to go with that.

My experiences over the years of my career let me observe steelhead being taken by gillnets in the Columbia during Chinook salmon seasons, even though steelhead were not the targeted specie. In the early 1970’s a commercial fisherman on the Columbia could sell steelhead in Oregon, but not in Washington. Fisheries seasons designed to catch Chinook inadvertently caught steelhead. The web of a gillnet for both the spring and fall commercial fisheries was of a larger size to target Chinook but it didn’t keep a fisherman from also landing large steelhead as well as Coho and the rare chum. Often sturgeon became wrapped in the web of a net sized to target either Coho or Chinook. Those who targeted sturgeon in a sturgeon-only fishery were required to use a much larger mesh. But still, they would frequently catch a salmon of some kind. I arrested several of them for doing just that when they kept the salmon outside of the sturgeon-only season. Gillnets are a highly effective tool to harvest salmon, but they are far, far from being species specific.

A really tragic example of this was experienced in the early 2000’s. Salmon managers wanted to be able to open a Columbia River spring Chinook gillnet season for a predicted healthy run of hatchery springers, so they did. They ill-advisedly adopted a Coho sized gillnet restriction (about 51/2 inch mesh) in order to have that smaller mesh size act as a tangle-tooth net for the larger specie. It backfired to a tragic degree. The gillnets killed about twenty one thousand steelhead – mostly wild! The smaller mesh designed to take Coho was perfect for killing large wild steelhead that run in the Columbia the same time as the targeted Chinook. Again, gillnets are not specie specific.

In the early 1990’s The Department of Fisheries hired a paid informant who was a gillnetter to get enforcement officers inside information and a connection to some of the major poaching problems in the commercial fisheries in Puget Sound. I was surprised at the amount of steelhead and immature Chinook that were black marketed in the late chum and Coho gillnet season in November. Even though the chum were a little larger than the winter run steelhead, still the bycatch was really high. That helped explain to me the rapid decline of the early steelhead population in rivers like the Puyallup and Nisqually. The bycatch was not documented on required landing documents. (That would be a good reason for having observers aboard random vessels during commercial seasons, rather than merely studying landing receipts.)

The informant put us onto a lot of egregious violations, not all of which were non-Indian related. A big raid by Fisheries officers on the Nisqually cost the Tribal Police Chief his job. I was there.

Early chum salmon bound for northern Hood Canal were routinely harvested in Coho gillnet fisheries years ago. (The chum became listed under ESA.) Why the bycatch? Because the chum are the same size as Coho. But there is more than a gillnet’s mesh size to be effective. They aren’t quite the single wall of net that many believe. It’s all about how the fisherman “hangs” the net when he’s building it. Columbia netters often “string” their nets from the cork line to the lead line with “strings” (heavy twine, actually) so that the net hangs from the cork line limp and loose, not taught. This creates an even more effective tool for catching salmon. The mesh becomes more effective because it amounts to a smaller mesh from being limp rather than stretched more tightly. Some gillnets are even constructed to have a double wall, or apron effect when hung by an expert. That not only increases the net’s effectiveness considerably, but also their bycatch. Gillnets are only SIZE selective.

I looked up the definition of a gillnet in the Washington Administrative Code for Commercial Fisheries. I was disappointed in what little I found. It doesn’t define gillnets as single wall nets. WAC 220-350-060 Definitions; Gillnet:

“Drift gillnet” or “drift net” gear shall be defined as a gillnet of single mesh construction, not anchored, tied, staked, placed, or weighted in such a manner that it cannot drift. 

Oversized Gillnet Measured by Hand…
Officer Kim received information that a subject was fishing in the Central Puget Sound with a gillnet that was well over the maximum 1,800 feet. In addition, the subject had two fish and wildlife warrants for his arrest. Officer Kim coordinated late night boat patrols that included nearly the entire detachment. The first coordinated patrols utilized two patrol vessels with Sgt. Olson, Officer Kim, Officer Greshock, Officer Munn and Officer Weidert. After the suspect was located, surveillance was conducted. Unfortunately, the suspect caught his net under his boat so the net length could not be verified. The suspect eventually had to have his vessel towed into Seattle for repairs.

During the next opener, two patrol vessels were utilized again to locate the suspect. The suspect was eventually located by Officer Greshock and Officer Weidert. Sgt. Olson, Officer Kim and Officer Munn arrived in a separate patrol vessel. After Officer Greshock and Officer Weidert observed the net fully deployed, the second patrol vessel was called in to measure the distance using radar. The net was measured at 2,184 feet, approximately 384 feet longer than legally permitted. This is a major commercial fishing violation, since it creates a navigational hazard and provides for a significant advantage to catch more fish.



Edited by Rick - 05 August 2019 at 8:29am
fiogf49gjkf0d
NC Fisheries Management- Motto: Too Little, Too Late, Too Bad   Slogan: Shrimp On! Mission Statement: Enable Commercial Fishing At Any and All Cost, Regardless of Impact to the Resource.
Back to Top
Rick View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 16 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 August 2019 at 8:28am
Early chum salmon bound for northern Hood Canal were routinely harvested in Coho gillnet fisheries years ago. (The chum became listed under ESA.) Why the bycatch? Because the chum are the same size as Coho. But there is more than a gillnet’s mesh size to be effective. They aren’t quite the single wall of net that many believe. It’s all about how the fisherman “hangs” the net when he’s building it. Columbia netters often “string” their nets from the cork line to the lead line with “strings” (heavy twine, actually) so that the net hangs from the cork line limp and loose, not taught. This creates an even more effective tool for catching salmon. The mesh becomes more effective because it amounts to a smaller mesh from being limp rather than stretched more tightly. Some gillnets are even constructed to have a double wall, or apron effect when hung by an expert. That not only increases the net’s effectiveness considerably, but also their bycatch. Gillnets are only SIZE selective.


This is why the tie-down measures in the CSMA must be reviewed.  

First of all, three foot tie-downs when set in much of the shallow water fished fail to meet the intended purpose.  

Second, when fished anywhere the net acts as described above.

 


Edited by Rick - 05 August 2019 at 9:21am
fiogf49gjkf0d
NC Fisheries Management- Motto: Too Little, Too Late, Too Bad   Slogan: Shrimp On! Mission Statement: Enable Commercial Fishing At Any and All Cost, Regardless of Impact to the Resource.
Back to Top
Get Bowed Up View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 08 August 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Get Bowed Up Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 August 2019 at 9:40am
My updated thoughts on the topic, if it's all about GD gillnets then make it about the GD gillnets and quit the end around and own it. The continued almighty TCommons, big daddy must keep in check evil harvesters, and anyone who makes a penny off of it should sit down, apologize, and then shut up isn't gaining support with the common folk. If ya don't see it, get out of your bubble, and look around (not Amazon).

Back to Top
BrackishWater View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 18 December 2014
Location: Pamlico River
Status: Offline
Points: 512
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote BrackishWater Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 August 2019 at 7:13pm
The fact that we have allowed our resource to get to the point where our fisheries managers are now having to close down harvest is an indictment of NC's history of poor fisheries management decisions. The angst now being expressed by fishermen is also an indictment of the apathy that has led most to ignore this coming storm. DMF scientists have been warning for almost two decades that reductions in harvest of Southern flounder were needed to reverse overfishing, culminating in the ill-fated 2015 supplement. The DMF scientists have been working on a new FMP since the NCFA lawsuit overturned the management measures implemented by the MFC in 2015 to achieve a 30% harvest reduction. The DMF has been preparing an amendment since the 2017 stock assessment showed overfishing was continuing but too many anglers chose to stay out of the process. The MFC is now left with little options than to go along with the 62 and 72 percent reductions as recommended by the SCIENCE. Where the recreational industry is left holding the bag is not being able to fight the DMF premise that the cuts had to be the same across sectors even though historically the rec sector has only accounted for approximately 15% of total harvest.

In his new book, "Fishing, Gone?" by Sid Dobrin, the author writes about what it really means to be a recreational angler, acknowledging from the start that recreational saltwater fishing is big business and big culture. But his challenge is that if we are to move toward sustainable practices, we must first move toward ways of thinking about fish and fisheries beyond mere economic agendas.

Gill nets are only one piece of the problem, just as shrimp trawl bycatch is another. And what they have in common with the recreational industry is that they are all a part of the economy of sustainability, and as editor Jimmie Killingsworth writes in the book's Foreward, "The so-called three E's of sustainability - economy, ecology and ethics - attract uneven emphasis, with the big E of economy too often overpowering the other E's."
A rising tide lifts all boats...
Back to Top
TomM View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 11 July 2006
Location: Roanoke Rapids
Status: Offline
Points: 2489
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TomM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 August 2019 at 8:53pm
The party never ends and the road goes on forever😩😩
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.11
Copyright ©2001-2012 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.