FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Water Column Leases To Affect You

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Glacierbaze View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 09 January 2005
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 3829
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Glacierbaze Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 August 2018 at 2:16pm
I didn't think cnaff's comments deserved a response, but then neither do Chris' efforts deserve to go unsupported, or unappreciated. So, thank-you, Chris.
"You can never elevate your own character by stepping on someone else's."

"Never argue with a man who loves the sound of his own voice."
Back to Top
cnaff View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 22 October 2006
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 955
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cnaff Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 August 2018 at 9:38am
Make no mistake, I appreciate Chris's lifelong fight to affect the ongoing fishery debacle over which we preside on this board. I also appreciate some currents of intent that are sometimes thrust into the conversation about the validity of certain types of people and their gravitas to engage hereon. By way of example, BW's simple statements in the past that some here(me,etc.) are too stupid and ignorant to participate. That's a rhetorical challenge, and I certainly have taken the opportunity to throw it up to him, in good faith that he can defend his position, and not need the help of anyone who feels duty-bound to protect him as a sacred cow. Chris made a couple of statements with which I take a certain amount of umbrage, clearly they are not important, but he issued them, and I am here to point out that they are related to BW's "down the nose" idea of stupid people on his platform when it comes to frustrated posters wanting to make sense of the convoluted, and logic destroying trajectory of the NC fish process. Several years ago, Chris allowed that he was transfixed by the small minded stasis of those who might question the decidedly left-wing thrust whereby the government so deeply wished to dictate what light bulbs we can use. I will state here, as an unequivocal point, waiting for Chris's long absent rebuttal of equivocation, that he issued this as a signal that he is swimming with donkeys and wishes we were a smarter bunch. To bother explaining that one's choice of lightbulb can be attended by myriad thought pathways and, in my mind, at least, to exalt the governing impulse to control that choice reeks of political correctness are both ideas which don't really need explication in a room full of sentient beings. But, by Chris's words, I realized that he ain't that satisfied with the hoi poloi as constituted on this board, but I guess he stuck it out for awhile and now he wants to say that he's tired of the fighting. I understand that, and, by God, I think he has done his best to influence and shape the history of our fishery, especially in terms of those who would see some level of conservation ethic apply, where the official state structure applies none. In his declaration of standing down in the fisheries fight, Chris likewise proposed to take along various old timers, similarly spent, to that boneyard where the fishery outrages are tolerated without rancor. So, despite his years of dedicated effort, the cut fuel lines, and the threats, for which I, and we, give him full credit and cudos, There is still the matter of the light bulbs, which he has never answered, and the matter of encouraging others to give up the fight, as seen in his words. Herein rests the full scope and thrust of my seeming ridicule, and I admit that it could be easy to mistake my words as literal contempt, but they are not, because I am truly begging him to find the words to defend the broad put down of those of us on this board who would so stupidly insist on picking our own light bulbs, AND, what kind of cop out is finally deciding to withdraw, as plainly stated in his post, taking the tired and beaten away with him as he goes. The reply that he has taken lumps and been threatened fall hard upon me, and I am appropriately bloodied and stand in diminished stature in a previously diminutive state of gravitas, for I am not confident that I could put up with the attendant weasels in NC's management regime. But this is a discussion board, and I am determined that the man be challenged with regard to his statements HERE. That is all, and If your ox be gored by that, then give it to me in kind, like that proverbial pig on a spit. The sacred cow is that we have board participation. I've seen vaunted protons of faithful nuclear fundament come to dust here by slamming the membership(O. Lipton, for example), so I think this is not a quixotic idea, but a relevant answer to seek: what would you advise, Chris, on the selection of our bulbs, and won't you leave a few persons of grave conservationist demeanor behind to pursue the goal of one day being able to hold our heads up as North Carolinians who also like our fish alive. Otherwise, you are utterly grand, and you have my blessing to go and do as you might choose, especially in the bulb department.
Edited "build" to " bulb".

Edited by cnaff - 07 August 2018 at 9:43am
V/H Dog
Back to Top
BaitWaster View Drop Down
Pro
Pro
Avatar
NCW PATRON

Joined: 15 July 2003
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 13145
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BaitWaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 August 2018 at 10:43pm
Originally posted by cnaff cnaff wrote:

Make no mistake, I appreciate Chris's lifelong fight to affect the ongoing fishery debacle over which we preside on this board. I also appreciate some currents of intent that are sometimes thrust into the conversation about the validity of certain types of people and their gravitas to engage hereon. By way of example, BW's simple statements in the past that some here(me,etc.) are too stupid and ignorant to participate.
.
.

I'm not here for a long time, but I'm here for a good time.

The days that I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations
Well, I have really good days - Ray Wylie
Back to Top
Rick View Drop Down
Pro
Pro


Joined: 16 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5854
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 August 2018 at 9:22am
From: "Chuffo, Marla" <marla.chuffo@ncdenr.gov>
Date: August 15, 2018 at 2:52:59 PM EDT
To: "denr.dmf.proclamation@lists.ncmail.net" <denr.dmf.proclamation@lists.ncmail.net>
Subject: [DENR.DMF.Proclamation] Public Hearing, proposed Shellfish Leases; Hyde County - Wanchese/Daniels, Sept 12th

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE

 

SHELLFISH BOTTOM

WANCHESE FISH COMPANY, INC., JOSEPH DANIELS; NO. 1948561, NO. 1948538, NO. 1948504, NO. 1948553

IN PUBLIC WATER OF HYDE COUNTY

  

Notice is hereby given that Wanchese Fish Company, Inc., Joseph Daniels (Agent), has filed the following applications for shellfish bottom leases, located near Pamlico Sound in Hyde County: NO.1948561 -9.99 Acres, NO.1948538 -9.47 acres, NO.1948504 -9.49 Acres and NO.1948553 -9.87Acres. The Director of the Division of Marine Fisheries for the State of North Carolina has notified the applicant that he will consider the proposed shellfish leases at a public hearing to be held on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 6:00 PM at the Engelhard Volunteer Fire Department, 34545 US Hwy 264, Engelhard, NC, 27824.

 

The areas will be marked at each corner as Proposed Shellfish Lease with the above numbers.

 

 Notes:

1.   Any member of the public will be given an opportunity to comment on the proposed shellfish lease and water column amendment applications. Comments may be made orally at the meeting or sworn written comments may be submitted to the Division of Marine Fisheries, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, NC 28557 until September 11, 2018 at 5 P.M.

 

2.   The Division of Marine Fisheries has determined that these applications are substantially consistent with the requirements of G.S. 113-202 and applicable Marine Fisheries Rules. The application file and biologist report for these proposed leases are available for inspection at the DMF office in Morehead City. 

 

This notice is pursuant to G.S. 113-202(f) this the 10th day of August 2018.  By authority of the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality.

Stephen W. Murphey, Director

Division of Marine Fisheries

 

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

Marla J. Chuffo

Administrative Specialist 1

Shellfish Lease Program

NC Division of Marine Fisheries

Habitat and Enhancement

 

252-808-8048 Office

marla.chuffo@ncdenr.gov

 

3441 Arendell Street

Post Office Box 769

Morehead City, NC 28557-0769

 




Agricultural/Forestry runoff certainly must not be an issue for oyster mariculture...or the overall issue that it's been made out to be in the past.







Edited by Rick - 22 August 2018 at 10:47am
fiogf49gjkf0d
NC Fisheries Management- Motto: Too Little, Too Late, Too Bad   Slogan: Shrimp On! Mission Statement: Enable Commercial Fishing At Any and All Cost, Regardless of Impact to the Resource.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.11
Copyright ©2001-2012 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.